[Mulgara-dev] RelatedTo.

[David Wood]

Hi all,

I actually found this functionality to be very, very useful in TKS  
and would love to see it implemented in Mulgara.  However, I have no  
objection to removal of the stubs so it can be done in a better way  
later.

Regards,
Dave


On 15 Oct2006, at 14:14, Paul Gearon wrote:

> I think it makes sense to remove them.  If we ever want anything  
> like that again, then doing it from a clean start would be much  
> better anyway.
>
> We should be concentrating on the *standard* operations first  
> anyway.  I only see the need to move onto other things once we have  
> the majority of those handled.
>
> Paul
>
> On Oct 13, 2006, at 5:54 AM, Andrae Muys wrote:
>
>>
>> Do we want to remove the related-to stubs?  For those who weren't  
>> with the project when it was a going commercial concern; these are  
>> stubs, points where the commercial TKS added code to implement a  
>> proprietary operation called 'relatedto'.  There is some ugliness  
>> in various parts of the code to provide this functionality.
>>
>> My preference is to remove the stubs, they get in the road of  
>> maintenance, and we don't have any way of using them anymore.
>>
>> Andrae
>>
>> -- 
>> Andrae Muys
>> andrae at netymon.com
>> Principal Mulgara Consultant
>> Netymon Pty Ltd
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mulgara-dev mailing list
>> Mulgara-dev at mulgara.org
>> http://mulgara.org/mailman/listinfo/mulgara-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Mulgara-dev mailing list
> Mulgara-dev at mulgara.org
> http://mulgara.org/mailman/listinfo/mulgara-dev
>