[Mulgara-general] Is it possible to set up Mulgara to use Jenaas its reasoner?

[Ghazzaoui, Ramez (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C]]

Thank you, Paul, for the quick and complete response. 

I hope that you will be able to help me also with the other question I
posted today on the mail list. I am having a very hard time creating an
entailment based on a simple rule to apply to a successfully loaded set
of RDF triples. This is preventing me from moving forward with my
current project. 

Regards, 

-Ramez 

_______________________________
Ramez Ghazzaoui
Contractor
NIH/NLM/LHC/CgSB/MOR
+1 (301) 435-3161
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gearon [mailto:gearon at ieee.org] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 3:46 PM
To: Mulgara General
Subject: Re: [Mulgara-general] Is it possible to set up Mulgara to use
Jenaas its reasoner?

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Ghazzaoui, Ramez (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C]
<ghazzaouir at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> I saw a brief discussion on the Mulgara web site about Jena going in
and
> going out of Mulgara. The entire discussion, and what prompted it,
isn't
> clear to me.
>
>
>
> I have a simple question: If I download Mulgara as it is today
(version
> 1.1.1) and download Jena, is there a way for me to set up Mulgara so
that it
> uses Jena as its core reasoner at any level?

Simple answer:  No.

Longer answer:  Issues in integrating with Jena necessarily took on
some of Jena's scalability problems. We want to put our own reasoner
into Mulgara (and even integrate with other reasoners), but due to
limited resources we are concentrating on scalability and reliability
for 2008.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Mulgara-general mailing list
Mulgara-general at mulgara.org
http://mulgara.org/mailman/listinfo/mulgara-general